"Farewell, My Concubine" A film review by Linda Lopez McAlister for the December, 1993 issue of HERS. This year's Cannes Film Festival had two first prize winners, Jane Campion's "The Piano," which I reviewed here last month, and Chen Kaige's "Farewell, My Concubine." Although these films couldn't be more different from each other, I can see why the judges found it impossible to choose between them. Each is a magnificent achievement in its own way. "Farewell, My Concubine," a Chinese film based on a novel by Hong Kong writer Lilian Lee, was banned in China before it achieved its great success in the West. It sets itself the monumental task of telling the whole history of China in the Twentieth Century. Just as the recent film "The Remains of the Day" depicts developments in Britain's geopolitical fortunes not by portraying those at the center of power but by relating the life stories of two people whose lives touch ever so tangentially on important political events, "Farewell, My Concubine" also depicts China's recent political history by focusing on the lives of people who are not, personally, players on the political stage. These people are, rather, players on a different stage-- that of the ancient Peking Opera. The film begins with a striking visual image of two costumed figures in a cone of light, two former performers in the Peking Opera in the spotlight once again twenty years after having performed there and eleven years since they have even seen one another. Then the story is told in flashback, starting in the age of the warlords in the 1920s. A woman and her young son push through the crowded streets and stop to watch some actors perform for the crowd. Afterward she seeks out the leader of the troupe and begs him to take her son into his school where actors are trained for the opera; she is a prostitute who cannot support her child. The teacher inspects the boy and rejects him because he has a deformity, a sixth finger on one hand, that will repulse the audience, he says. The woman leads her son away into a back alley and abruptly amputates the offending digit, so desperate is she to find a way to make a possible life for her son. The life into which he is thrown is equally violent and brutal for the training these boys are put through relies on corporal punishment for the slightest infraction until perfection is achieved in the intricate and demanding ancient art of Chinese opera. The boy is frail and small and is trained to play female roles, being beaten every time he, by mistake, sings, "I am by nature a boy not a girl." By the time he reaches adolescence, Dieyi (Leslie Cheung) is the most exquisite performer in the role of the concubine and is, offstage and on, somewhat feminine in his demeanor, while his larger childhood friend and protector Xiaolou (Zhang Fengyi) plays the masculine role of the King on stage and is robust and a "normal" male in his offstage behavior and desires. In the 1930s they are the toast of Peking, treated like movie stars wherever they go, admired and adored. Xiaolou frequents high class brothels and without really meaning to do so ends up saying he's the fiance of, and then marrying, a prostitute named Juxian (played by the wonderful Gong Li whom you may know from her previous roles in "Raise the Red Lantern" and "The Story of Qui Ju"). Dieyi, who loves his friend offstage as well as on, is crushed, angry, and distraught. He plunges joylessly into opium smoking and drunken erotic adventures with Mr. Yuan, a wealthy admirer. The artistic partnership, however, continues through the Japanese invasion when Xiaolou is arrested by the Japanese and Dieyi performs for them in exchange for Xiaolou's release, an act of loyalty to his "stage brother" and disloyalty to China for which he will pay dearly later. As China moves through the Nationalists and the various Commu- nist regimes and into the Cultural Revolution the complex crises on the political scene are matched by the complex changes they bring to the lives of Dieyi, Xiaolou, and Juxian. Love, jealousy, hatred, betrayal, and dedication to their art move them in a pattern as complex, dramatic, and inevitable in its denouement as that of the story of the king and concubine they devote their lives to embodying. I came out of the theater after seeing this nearly three-hour epic (and there is a five hour version that has had special screenings in some cities) I felt emotionally drained and yet filled with admiration for the cinematic achievement this film represents. I don't think I know of anything quite so ambitious in its scope since some of the silent epics of Eisenstein or Gance. If you are a lover of the art of film, this is something you definitely will want to see. It was part of one of the recent film festivals in Sarasota and will open in Tampa at the Tampa Theater in December. Copyright 1993 by Linda Lopez McAlister. No part of this review may be reprinted or reproduced without the permission of the author.