"Malcolm X" Reviewed by Linda Lopez McAlister On "The Women's Show" WMNF-FM November 21, 1992 Never has it been clearer to me than it is this week how much one's reception of a film is colored by other things that are going on it one's life. In the last few days--in this order--I heard a talk by the white radical lesbian separatist philosopher Mary Daly, saw "Malcolm X" and heard a talk by black feminist theorist and cultural critic bell hooks. "Malcolm X," as you must certainly know from all the media hype that has preceded it, is Spike Lee's new film of epic proportions (it's three and a half hours long) about the Black Nationalist leader slain in 1964, played so superbly by Denzel Washington that at the end when documentary footage of Malcolm is interspersed with pseudodocumentary sequences of Washington, it's almost impossible to tell anymore which are which. What I am thinking about "Malcolm X" today is enormously influenced by the fact that for me the film was sandwiched between Daly and hooks, though neither of them had seen or specifically addressed the film. One thought that kept occurring to me as I was watching Malcolm X give his speeches was how much his separatist rhetoric and Mary Daly's separatist rhetoric had in common. It seemed to me that with judicious additions or subtractions of the adjective "white" in the phrase "white man" long stretches of what Malcolm said in denunciation of what has been done to Blacks in American could have been said by Mary Daly about the oppression of women by men and likewise much of Daly's devastating critique of the treatment of women under patriarchy Malcolm could have articulated himself though he would have fingered the white man, not just man as the perpetrator. And, good radical feminist that I am, I thought to myself that this shouldn't be surprising, since the same heteropatriarchal, hierarchical structures of dominance and subordination are at work in both instances. The interlocking oppressions of sexism, racism, heterosexism and the like do not exist in a vacuum and as a feminist I need to support all efforts to liberate those who have been victimized by what Karen Thompson calls simply "the white male system." And maybe, if I hadn't heard bell hooks yesterday, I would have come in here today and given a review of "Malcolm X" that focused more on the cinematic elements of the film and what Black liberation struggles and women's liberation struggles have in common than on the troubling overt misogyny of the film. However, bell hooks came to town and talked about the violence done to Black women by the misogny of black males in popular culture and the media--an industry owned and controlled by white male corporate America. And that set me thinking again about the misogyny in "Malcolm X." Not just the blatant misogyny of the young Malcolm treating both Black and white women with contempt, nor just the misogyny of the Black muslim religion that sees woman as having to be kept subordinate, obediant, and chaste (to paraphrase hooks "Black islamic fundamentalism is no more attractive than white Christian fundamentalism"), but particularly the misogyny of the filmmakers who tack on at the end an apotheosis, a paeaen to black manhood worldwide, with a dozen or so little black boys from around the world but not a single little black girl standing up and proclaiming "I am Malcolm X" and Nelson Mandela giving his blessing. One has to ask, and what of Black women in this scenario? Where are they? Given the transformations in thinking that Malcolm X went through after his break with the Nation of Islam and his pilgrimage to Mecca and his capacity for change, one wonders how far he might have come in understanding the interconnectedness between sexism and racism had he lived--there are suggestions that he could have. (Hooks started her speech with a quote from Malcom X that suggested he had some awareness of the situation of Black women). But I am far less sanguine about the capacity of Spike Lee to overcome his sexism and heterosexism. He has made a truly admirable film in cinematic terms in "Malcolm X" and I definitely think it should be seen, but his misogyny shines through. I agree with hooks that we need to ask why white corporate America is so supportive of black misogynist cultural products be they films, records, videos, etc. and why white males often emulate this black misogyny as cool and hip. It looks like white misogynists using black misogynists to help carry on the time honored task of putting women down. As Mary Daly says, patriarchy is still the global religion. For the WMNF Women's Show this is Linda Lopez McAlister on women and film.